Meta PI

Meta Preemptive Inclinations:**

1.Tea Party shocker: Even right-wingers become liberals when they turn off Fox News
2. The Thought Catalog revolution: How trolling took over the Internet
3. Libertarians are very confused about capitalism
More to read links from Salon.
GOP’s intolerance trap: How ENDA fight explains all of U.S. politics
Paul Krugman on America’s “mutilated” economy (a)*
Albert Camus anticipated the Arab Spring
Michigan mayor: We’re not under Shariah law!
Must-see morning clip: Patrick Stewart slams Rand Paul and others as comedians with “bad script writers”
Salon exclusive: More Rand Paul plagiarism

*bold indicative of order read

[Where is the department of that?]
Veterans Day is a prayer for peace

[NOW with Alex Wagner GOP/Grand Old Problem/Deal With It (Akin to three way chess)] .
**Mangled Pythagorean Interests (Force Fear Fancy Futures) 

Lemon Ship

Friday evening I used the sinking ship metaphor in a conversation[*].  It is more accurately the lemon (twist) ship, definitely in need of work. 

[*]8-26-13 Or lemonade plank metaphor ? Talking about mixed metaphors. (FP1)
Walking the plank plays into the dynamic evolution.  As a party wanes out of power, less partisan or more pragmatic(some may read opportunistic) members leave to dilute the partisanship of the new ship and leave a more concentrated sunken ship.  As I have now expanded the sort here are more to (un-b.s.) or blog search:
 mangled mixed meta for  ... or 3M.
1.  A. The honeymoon is over?, B. Ditto Heads Unite!
2.  A. Obtusity? , B.The Read C? C. Oh Sasha!  D. Independent comment
3**.  A. The Read C?  B., C., D., E., F. The History of B.S. , G. What the Beck?
M-bed Ed Pun
**oar 4M(see meta for)

[NOW and AM : The Thin Red Line and Chris*** Hill ?]
***
[UN-Common $ense or $Cents? Breaking Email: Frank Rich]
{pre-The Cycle-seg way}{*}
[In order too... parody wrap ... sounds familiar.]
{*}links added 8-27-13

PIT Spot?

Meta-cystical point or so duh?


Not to pump the mess anger or dis-road improvements. 


i.e. change of(4) course


At this point, I will refrain from inserting links to confound or unfuse the above.
My O.I. is in the Lab3ls [!]


A.  NFRY
B.  Meta-slash
C.  Ribble
4.  P.C.




RSN: Smallest Font- Unread, Normal Font- Read, Small Font (or bold)- of special interest
Nicholas Kristof New York Times, Agence France-Presse,  David Remnick, The New Yorker, Jason Rosenbaum, National Public Radio, (...under construction)   Frank Rich, New York Magazine
TO: (...Under Construction)   .Yana Kunichoff, Truthout | Interview..


Spoiler alert?  The Last Word, Howard Dean ? IBT: wps 

Hump Day?

To Re:view Page:
Original intent to retrace the War on Hillary[!] links.
Under RE:VIEWING we find: File for Facebook.(but that is a tangent)
So back to 12-2-14.  We find Culture*. Below that we find OW [!]
Then (FP1) parses the Greek. Under which I find a new anamoly.** [A Witt gen stein?]
Within FP! we have (FP2)
Under post-pyth we have more on Hillary.  Prior threads and Pythagorean work on the way.
That's the ticket. C. bad+press Other Greeks*** to Countdown. or un-Vienna Circle?
The Calculus of DOW or coneheads? (Jung, Euclid, Barlow), (Newton Liebniz Asimov), Dar Tan Ya?

But back to the parsing or back from the tangent.
~~~~
(FP1)
~~~~
 (Liebniz Dar Ching)
There is no plausible metaphilosophy. All is metaphysics. 
Wittgenstein/NewLieb/TOW: words, math, subjective  /* objective Larouche / Rand?

Manual Blog Search: Not Just ... a Pen Chant 4 Geo Metrics.
Exceptionalism and the Slippery Slope , I.Q.* (draft) , Gitmo or less. ,
 Reading In Progress[***], Full Read! ?,  Hume or boo , F'N 3
[Need to review labeling of photos, images, cartoons etc]

Is the rational, math or language? 
Is subjective/objective the real ManyKey'nIsm or classical economics?
C-Shelley ? Or pre- stein.

*asterisk in original (* R.I.P.)
** leave as anamoly of [scroll over unclickable]
***  need to adjust way point(that's the ticket)

(FN!) : Starting with the last insert.(*-5) = mics? in regards to the meta-plausible.
(*-9)@ ManyKey'nIsm we (b.s.)Tryunism for 3 links in 2 posts.
A bit more anachronistic(*-1) we are Frank 'n pre-cast[!] 'n loosing the thread with C-Shelley ?
Or Shilling Schiller [!] 

Four Models(~):

 

(~) models : Milo Mulligan / The message is the mess.  (~) Para-model

Penta-meta point ?
Geo-metrics [!] ? (~)





 /*  : (2-4-14) [ / ]=subjective+objective:(b.s.) link inserted also two selected from(fp3)

Digging Up and Digging In.

Or Digging Out...

As I paused to reflect on the appropriateness of the connections above, the third popped into place. But it is a grave matter, this journalism*.

The field of meta4; one, two, three, strikes yer out. The Metaphysical Meta-for.

[Further digs to read or Dickens of a future, past and present. ]
[And one more shovel or scoop of apathy.**

*Health Care
** intended link
*** (future link: see comment) Nuance of polls and evolution of the word
[Update: the word]

Obtusity?

Not Here.(Kay label added)
Nor Here.
But in context the former Here is the proper angler.

In a less embedded aside, Leonard Pitts Jr. hits the nail on the head of American Exceptionalism.

In another arena, a friend noted how trustworthy FOX and Bill O'Reilly are. Well, 28% and 9% are far from a margin of victory unless you are looking for an American Icon. NBC, MSNBC, CBS, and ABC combine for 29% while CNN's Cooper and Blitzer match O'Reilly's 9%, and the a4mentioned other network's hosts(Matthews, Brokaw, Couric and Sawyer tied) combine for 12%. So it is only in the winner[*] take all, not knowing what it takes world, where follow the leader matters. Now that is a real Laffer Curveball! Or is it?

[Then there is Pawlenty of problems. Bottom line: if money is a maker then tax it as much as labor. That is an inverse paradox or maybe praximoron.]
[The bottom line is obliquity with intent.]
[Sub** Text]

** asterisks apply to that link, but is not the missing link, but does fit the leadership narrative over people.
[*] boo yeah! Stewart boosts O'Reilly's ratings(**), which likely rigs poll. i.e. maybe FOX viewers are more fair and balanced when the left is presented.
(**) I don't have the Nielsen ratings but it might be reflected in the poll.
[Footnote: scroll over some links for some understanding, but unfortunately links that may need clicking on do not last forever. Hence I hope to be less obtuse but no less oblique in the future. There should be no joy in mud-ville, as the outcome of the NY26th shows, as divided meta(for) prevails. But to unembed these analogies, the Ryan plan was the issue in the divide to lose in New York, 48% takes it, while the issue will next be before the U.S. Senate with Democrats in the majority and Republicans faced with laying their votes on the line. Some will leave the sinking ship, diluting the lemonade. If I may make a few Truman references it is not a direct analogy, but hanging their votes on their necks will be like dividing to conquer.]
[Meanwhile Up-Date]
[Speaking of not Truman--something about:

If it's a choice between a genuine Republican, and a Republican in Democratic clothing, the people will choose the genuine article, every time; that is, they will take a Republican before they will a phony Democrat, and I don't want any phony Democratic candidates in this campaign.

With my lemon twist on it:

If it's a choice between a genuine Moderate, and a Moderate in Republican clothing, the people will choose the genuine article, every time; that is, they will take a Democrat before they will a phony Moderate(update 10-11-2011), and I don't want any phony Moderate candidates in this campaign.

OK, it loses a little bit of it's zest, but that is the nature of the slippery-slope, trickle down, lemonade, mudville.]

[Update 12-8-11 The Last Word? As it seemed to line up.]

Meta-Flack

Nitty Piketty [!]
Or nickety snickers? (spectators)

[Mezzo flack ?  The dOW? 5 6 7 8 ]

( scroll / click ? ) (:~:)
[fb /   y-t]
p-o-b...
c-b- 




ow ?

Perspectivism

On Obama[!]
Lede or other shi#?

1. Meta PI*
2. (b.s.) turd+blossom**
3. (b.s.) lede or ineffable

Not that it worked out by intention, but "#/other/lede" are the order of inserted links.

(FP1)need update and reference to {L} to consider order of insert later
*gno pun intended nor post intelligencer  (npi)
** to  &3 file later  / 2. a, b, c, d. / 3.

Clear Eyes,

Full Hearts, Can't Use* ?

It is unclear what the Romney ticket is going with, Mo'better Bush or Mo'better Obama, but certainly not No Drama Either or is it ether?  Somewhere the Romney/Ryan/RNC use of the term quarterback escapes me.  Even if it was just me, I think that Monday morning or anyday other day than game day is their style. 

* was going to go with caffeinated but that was too Mormoney. 

(Tagg we are it ?)
Replacement Refs or Not...  (Bu' dump 'ump [!] ... ** )

===============
10-18-12
RETRO_SEG_WAY?
UNCLE SAM KNOT?
Or Fair and Balanced, not ? !
Or Just US!
=========

** updated, Thom Hartmann(Bu'), Norman Goldman(Dump), Randi Rhodes ('ump) (Bu' dump 'ump)/Re:tale.
Re:R,R,R A - R(not exactly) (j, k, l, m, n, o, p, q, r )

Not to Dump on Norman Goldman(nor Republicans), he is describing RepubliCONS as smart and fighting like cats and dogs over congress, while compromise is only for the president as candidate.  He makes further cracks about the difficulties of Bozo John Boehner as House Speaker in hurding*** them. (my paraphrasing & rhetorical metamorphing.)

*** circular firing rhetorical metaphors(cats and dogs)
(Obama has a better record given his opposition, Romney had to cooperated with a 78% Democratic legislature which has the power.***) Yeah that asterisk is redundant... who needs Republicans when ...  democracy is all over the map?)

[Bin Go ! Who let  the names out? Con $(c)ent Ration ? (C S c R !) ]

FOOTNOTES PAGE ONE SEPTEMBER 2014

Footnotes Page
in draft*
-

*(b.s.)=blog search
-
Re:labels & other blog spots.

A K A / August missing Footnotes Page
Categorical Empiricists ?**
-

** CAD (To be or not 3d) ?






9-9-14 Original Intent or in tent
(AM IT: [tan gent(~)] Andrea Mitchell ISIS Threat /-/ Witt Gen Stein/Jihadist  Defeating IS IS?
This is not to pun or purge, but to more carefully review later, the word.)


{Stop.} At this point, I will change the heading of this link from #(9-3-14) to "FOOTNOTES PAGE ONE SEPTEMBER 2014"\
-
9-9-14{nexus}
PIT Spot? 1.  T= A. PIT Schtick, B. Clause Wits (3.0)?, C. There is no Savior, :D, E: Three Clauses for ...  [any body love Rice?  Ronan Farrow Daily?]
2. Spoiler Alert? Not yet M-bed ed.
3. C-O.I.? = A.Original Intent?, B. GOP Plan to Hurt Economy, C. The Exit Strategy, D~?.  vOO due: vCR, E. Where everyone needs to read..., F. Table of Contents, G. Health Care Summit, H. Progressive Poll  I. What are the Frackin' Odds..., J.Happy Earth Day!, K.Try Angle,  L. Mess Age Monger,  M. Post-Turkey Day,  N. Nadir, O. Clause Wits, P. Romer Resigns,  Q. Go Purple!,   R. Give an inch..., S. Temporal, T. Back to "The One Thing?". @  {(~)} Future Bubble?


~: OH REALLY FOG / Catch-44
4loreMat[?]: labels 3~ NFRY, meta/slash, P.C.? [/]4Ribble! 
TRP/RBTL: 

Meta World

Peace Out!

The Lost Obama.
[under construction: there is more to the DBA.]

No, this is not a parting shot. But it is a crack or google at DBA.
I really should not make light of crack pots.



"by crack/key" [!]

Hint: Have your scroll on or click on.

[New MO(or no mo']
[Mo bama Slash Oh-ba-ma]

[Index A and B in progress, Oh Ba Ma ? Irons in the fire, without ironies. Not so fast.

My point of this taxing tangent is the GeOhMeTry* of escalation or not sum game.]
A hint is sometimes in the scroll, over.

[Posted today: This is A, B, C and D. Under D and team[!] there is Will Time.]
[The Process?]
* my pinnacle or bubble theory in regards to Politics, Religion, Economics, and Foreign Relations (more specifically, the values dynamics)

A wonder...

[Finally posted 11-29-11]
Be careful what you wish for. Actually I was just wondering if I alway have the best of intentions. I believe I do. Actually(and the word literally may be the key *) I am usually wondering, and not usually about wishes or intentions. What I was concerned about is not being taken correctly. And that is dangersous with satire, not to mention other's ways with words. I wonder if that is what M(in)M had in mind when he punned his nom de plume.

* some(or sum) might say trigger

I
II

III

IV
V
V

11-22-11
SEGUE OWS: True Footnote now makes three. Missing link(bottom) noted, no pun on evolution. But it is "A wonder..." and Revolution 11-21-11 that suff ice? Draft?(a,b,c,d, e,f,g,h,i,j, k,l,m,n,p,o,q,r, s,t,u) No u v, but up to you. (meta yogurt)

Hegelian Rationality?

HR? Proposed Concept.

For the science religion dichotomy/dilemma. (1-2)
Rationality and irrationality at(3) the same table, and in the same chair.  (shoes/feet/mouth/toss)*
VC: a Virtuous Clog?  P5+1 example.  Cotton pick'n GOP another. 
State of Strauss and the Torah the antithesis? 

Zion is asemantic!

Process proposal?  Kant we... Waltz?

*pundittering additions
(#'d)inserts [ s~r , d/d ]  :: (3) youtube IAM  :: VC vital cognisance? :: State'n Hegel? 
Original aphorism?  (Wit'N Pythagorus)
Lables TBA : T'issue Tan'go?  :: (to be Kantinued)

M-bed F'N:
Strauss :  a. No Teddy , Para~graph Three! , Monday Morning Rally... , Bin(un)Jun'Go , Hegelian Rationality? , Neo-changian? , Relemma'n Leo , Esoteric Relemma[!]
  
RIG^ / SOG subj/obj geometry  : RIG'N progress ~ N = poetics^ / Nietzsche? (tot~ology)
 [ dit , IF,  IW ] ~ lie`bearE? akin to NFR~'Y
Numbers R objective ideal and subjective reality? Cultural conditioning? 25~min.> systemic analysis/
meanfeltic[!] stastical rhetoric?  Meta-Clastic?

Throwing the Game

or Tetrahedron.

Or should we call it die with less perspective?

Bottom line? I mean, who am I to advise the GOP, but the Pizza Guy may just be the best thing for the country. Not that I would go that far, but if he makes it to nominee, I mean, it just might be good for the national debate. At least he will have one up on the MBA president, if not the constitutional law and community organizer president. I mean just what business is the country in? Let alone what it means to grow the pie.

The other lines? Well I will work on them later, but there may be something to Jon Stewart's point, if not baiting photobombers. I don't want to run the table, but I guess that is another table.


[Post-Ribble or Meta-4: the above was written without the benefit of having followed much ofor many of the links. It was based simply on the point that we have an executive of Godfather's Pizza running for president, and it might be good for the debate. That and the pun on dice(plural) or the lesser perspectives/dimentions of the tetrahedron. But I will now add that I will also contrast in a less dimensional way, Andrew Breitbart and Jon Stewart, they only hinge on the 1st amendment. In that regard I clicked on a link at the latter's and note the "freedom of speech" and the rest of I.T.

Bocephus had a point, even though he was wrong about almost everything else. There is something strange, to say the least about Boehner and Obama playing golf, while some fiddle.

What are the odds? (I can't find where I buried the original ref: but I guess that means that Netanyahu not only might have played golf with Hitler, but he would pin a badge on him. I guess that leaves me off the Picard(cunnard) upon which Brietbart has hoisted himself.) It is not uncommon for me to lose links, but what are the odds the last thing in my email is on Cain.]

[10-6-11 update: Hank Williams Jr.-No Dylan - I agree with Hank Williams Jr. in his apology "The thought of the Leaders of both Parties Jukin and High Fiven on a Golf course, while so many Families are Struggling to get by simply made me Boil over and make a Dumb statement and I am very Sorry if it Offended anyone. I would like to Thank all my supporters. This was Not written by some Publicist." But I beg to differ on the move to get money out of politics. [The devil is in the details, and what is left out. I think the petition is flawed. While I support the intent and wish it well, what will it be replaced with? What influence will the media then have in filtering the debate? What influence will corporations then have in crafting any messages? Get money out of the news! Get money out of "free speech"! If you catch my drift.] HW Jr. used a disgusting analogy, but Dylan Ratigan's petition just falls short of being comprehensive.]
[If wishes were fishes...we'd be fed up. Bain or cut bait, and candy and nuts.]

Re-4 mu lations*

'n Meta(**) for's.

* (Navigation Parsed)
(**) curb theory: (e) Conservative Foray (4A) , (f) Un-State of the Union
[ ** ] Alter Under Construction

To un-M bed:
The Rut We Can't Get Out Of

[TS -B 10/1/13 11:31 AM]

Foo Wrappers

Hedges,
Giroux,
PC, ID ?
MetaPhysical
Alt Fray

Marco Pole Oh

Bottom line

While some of the features of BlogSpot have evolved, there is a missing link that is the bottom line.   http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2011/12/reel-ledership.html

But who am I to judge. And who are you?
Speaking of Who Awe!
But don't go there.**
Where? Well I won't play that game [!]
But a word of caution on international justice and who started what, and how it is finished.
Let alone the question of values and checks and balances, not to mention debts.

But* I do hope to follow up.

* I thru XVII

[My dashboard has apparently undergone a Meta-More-Phosis.]

** You Who Awe that is.  Judge for yourself though.

[12-17-11 Quick's Odic Thread Hint: Hooah!
Hint: minus 2 point oh, I am making a presumptive link.
i.e. I had yet read the GPS reference in "Odic".]